holding that the PLRA's limit on the amount of attorney's fees that can be awarded to inmate's counsel satisfied the rational basis test
Summary of this case from Rodriguez v. CookNos. 96-17277, 97-16237
Argued and Submitted March 10, 1998 — San Francisco, California.
Filed July 2, 1998
holding that the PLRA's limit on the amount of attorney's fees that can be awarded to inmate's counsel satisfied the rational basis test
Summary of this case from Rodriguez v. Cookdescribing canon of "expressio unius est exclusio alterius"
Summary of this case from United States v. RrapiIn Madrid, for example, the Ninth Circuit relies on a dictionary definition of the word which does, indeed, seem all-inclusive at first glance.
Summary of this case from Rodriguez v. ZavarasFull title:ALEJANDRO MADRID, CARLOS LUTZ, RONNIE DEWBERRY, STEVEN VILLA, BRUCE VORSE…
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Date published: Jul 2, 1998
[3] In addressing an equal protection claim, we must first decide the level of scrutiny. We apply a strict…
Hanley v. StewartCleburne v. Cleburne Living Ctr., 473 U.S. 432, 440, 105 S.Ct. 3249, 87 L.Ed.2d 313 (1985). As the Ninth…