From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Madison v. Spancrete Machine Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 867 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

December 27, 2000.

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J. — Counsel Fees.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., GREEN, HAYES, WISNER AND LAWTON, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Contrary to the contention of plaintiff, Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in granting his motion to compel his attorney to sign a consent to change attorney form upon the condition that his incoming attorneys reimburse his former attorney for actual cash disbursements. The payment of those disbursements was an advance of litigation expenses for which plaintiff is ultimately responsible ( see, Code of Professional Responsibility DR 5-103 [b] [1] [ 22 NYCRR 1200.22 (b) (1)]; NY St Bar Assn Opn No. 653 [1993]). Plaintiff's former attorney is not required to defer recoupment until plaintiff's ultimate recovery ( see, Caruso v. Sinistorie, 18 A.D.2d 1074, 1075).


Summaries of

Madison v. Spancrete Machine Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 867 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Madison v. Spancrete Machine Corporation

Case Details

Full title:TYRONE L. MADISON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SPANCRETE MACHINE CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 27, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 867 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
718 N.Y.S.2d 910

Citing Cases

Moore v. Ackerman

For present purposes, and in the first instance, "disbursements" must be understood as amounts "advanced" on…