From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maddocks v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Oct 23, 2012
1:11-cv-00461-NT (D. Me. Oct. 23, 2012)

Opinion

1:11-cv-00461-NT

10-23-2012

DEBORAH L. MADDOCKS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER AFFIRMING THE

RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision filed September 30, 2012, the Recommended Decision is affirmed.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The Commissioner's final decision is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Nancy Torresen

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Maddocks v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Oct 23, 2012
1:11-cv-00461-NT (D. Me. Oct. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Maddocks v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DEBORAH L. MADDOCKS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Oct 23, 2012

Citations

1:11-cv-00461-NT (D. Me. Oct. 23, 2012)

Citing Cases

Staples v. Colvin

This court has addressed similar reversals in the past. In those cases, I noted that reconsideration of the…

Leslie B. v. Saul

Rather, as the Supreme Court ... observed in Barnhart v. Walton, 122 S. Ct. 1265, 1270 (2002), a claimant…