From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Madden v. ITT Long Term Disability Plan for Salaried Employees

U.S.
Feb 19, 1991
498 U.S. 1087 (1991)

Summary

holding that delegatee's actions are reviewed for abuse of discretion if discretionary authority is delegated

Summary of this case from Martinez v. the Beverly Hills Hotel

Opinion

No. 90-961.

February 19, 1991.


ORDER

C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 914 F. 2d 1279.


Summaries of

Madden v. ITT Long Term Disability Plan for Salaried Employees

U.S.
Feb 19, 1991
498 U.S. 1087 (1991)

holding that delegatee's actions are reviewed for abuse of discretion if discretionary authority is delegated

Summary of this case from Martinez v. the Beverly Hills Hotel

holding defendant entitled to summary judgment if he establishes that one element of the plaintiffs cause of action does not exist

Summary of this case from Cornyn v. Speiser, Krause

noting that "[a]bsent an express grant of discretion over entitlement determinations, the deferential review operates adversely . . . to `afford less protection to employees and their beneficiaries'"

Summary of this case from Campbell v. Chevron Phillips Chemical Co., L.P.
Case details for

Madden v. ITT Long Term Disability Plan for Salaried Employees

Case Details

Full title:MADDEN v. ITT LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 19, 1991

Citations

498 U.S. 1087 (1991)

Citing Cases

Slavik v. Dr. Pepper Bottling Co. of Tex.

"Discretionary authority cannot, however, be implied; an administrator has no discretion to determine…

Chevron Chem. v. Workers Union 4-447

Wildbur v. ARCO Chem. Co., 974 F.2d 631, 637 (5th Cir.) (quoting Block v. Pitney Bowes Inc., 952 F.2d 1450,…