From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mackenzie v. Jones

Supreme Court of the United States
Feb 19, 2019
139 S. Ct. 1194 (2019)

Summary

In Jones v. MacKenzie, 8 Cir., 122 F. 390, 392, the defendants claimed title to certain railroad ties through a sale made under a chattel mortgage, and also claimed to be in possession thereof, though the ties were piled on the land of a third person.

Summary of this case from Missouri-K.-T. R. Co. v. Sanders

Opinion

No. 18–7064.

02-19-2019

Thomas W. MACKENZIE, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.


Summaries of

Mackenzie v. Jones

Supreme Court of the United States
Feb 19, 2019
139 S. Ct. 1194 (2019)

In Jones v. MacKenzie, 8 Cir., 122 F. 390, 392, the defendants claimed title to certain railroad ties through a sale made under a chattel mortgage, and also claimed to be in possession thereof, though the ties were piled on the land of a third person.

Summary of this case from Missouri-K.-T. R. Co. v. Sanders
Case details for

Mackenzie v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:Thomas W. MACKENZIE, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida…

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Feb 19, 2019

Citations

139 S. Ct. 1194 (2019)
203 L. Ed. 2d 225

Citing Cases

St. Louis Smelting Refining Co. v. Hoban

; 113 A.L.R. 940 at 941 of Annotation; Ophir Silver Mining Co. v. Superior Court, 147 Cal. 467; Black v.…

Missouri-K.-T. R. Co. v. Sanders

' In Jones v. MacKenzie, 8 Cir., 122 F. 390, 392, the defendants claimed title to certain railroad ties…