From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mack v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 29, 2005
17 A.D.3d 1006 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

CA 04-01577.

April 29, 2005.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Donna M. Siwek, J.), entered March 8, 2004 in an action for money damages and declaratory relief. The order granted defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint.

DAMON MOREY LLP, BUFFALO (MICHAEL J. WILLETT OF COUNSEL), BROWN CHIARI LLP, LANCASTER, FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.

HURWITZ FINE, P.C., BUFFALO (DAN D. KOHANE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Present: Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court. We add only that revisions in defendant's insurance policy, made in accordance with directives of the Insurance Department of the State of New York, have resolved the ambiguities previously found by this Court in Canastraro v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. ( 256 AD2d 1161, lv denied 93 NY2d 806).


Summaries of

Mack v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 29, 2005
17 A.D.3d 1006 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Mack v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:WAYNE MACK et al., Appellants, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 29, 2005

Citations

17 A.D.3d 1006 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
793 N.Y.S.2d 794

Citing Cases

Servedio v. State Farm Ins. Co.

See Def.'s Mem. of Law 20. Servedio has made it clear, however, that his suit is not a dispute about the…