From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mack v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 9, 1976
324 So. 2d 642 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

No. 74-1556.

January 9, 1976.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, St. Lucie County, Wallace Sample, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Bruce Zeidel, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and J. Robert Olian, Asst. Atty. Gen., South Miami, for appellee.


Appellant and a co-defendant were charged in Count I with breaking and entering a vehicle, and in Count II with possession of burglarious tools. The trial court granted a motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of the state's case as to Count II and reserved ruling on the motion as to Count I. Appellant was convicted of the charge in Count I.

We have reviewed the evidence presented by the state and find it insufficient to create a prima facie case of breaking and entering a vehicle against appellant. The case presented by the state is circumstantial and is not wholly inconsistent with a reasonable hypothesis of innocence. Lockett v. State, Fla.App. 1972, 262 So.2d 253.

Thus, appellant's motion for judgment of acquittal should have been granted as to all counts.

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence appealed from are reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to discharge appellant.

Reversed and remanded.

CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mack v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 9, 1976
324 So. 2d 642 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

Mack v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES BYRON MACK, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 9, 1976

Citations

324 So. 2d 642 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Citing Cases

State v. Hankins

" See also Mack v. State, 324 So.2d 642, 643 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). The gravamen of the offense of burglary,…