From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mack v. Meier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1998
251 A.D.2d 298 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 1, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Sherwood, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff has failed to plead the existence of a fiduciary relationship which would support a cause of action for constructive fraud, and the record does not support a finding that such a relationship existed (see, Brown v. Lockwood, 76 A.D.2d 721, 731). Accordingly, the complaint was properly dismissed.

Mangano, P. J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mack v. Meier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1998
251 A.D.2d 298 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Mack v. Meier

Case Details

Full title:JUDITH MACK, Appellant, v. BRUCE S. MEIER et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 298 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
675 N.Y.S.2d 540

Citing Cases

Pappas v. Passias

In the first and tenth causes of action, the plaintiff failed to plead the elements of fraud with the…

Levin v. Kitsis

he elements of a cause of action to recover for constructive fraud are the same as those to recover for…