From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mack v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 20, 2011
459 F. App'x 213 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-7223

12-20-2011

ROBERT L. MACK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; JOHN R. OWEN, Warden; DR. KRISTIC BRANTLEY, Drug Program Coordinator, Defendants - Appellees.

Robert L. Mack, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (4:10-cv-00567-HMH)

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert L. Mack, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robert L. Mack appeals the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mack v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 4:10-cv-00567-HMH (D.S.C. Aug. 3, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Mack v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 20, 2011
459 F. App'x 213 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Mack v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT L. MACK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; JOHN…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 20, 2011

Citations

459 F. App'x 213 (4th Cir. 2011)