holding that false-light invasion of privacy case was governed by law of state in which plaintiff resided and in which defendant conducted and disseminated results of the investigation that formed the subject of the lawsuit
Summary of this case from Konikoff v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaNo. 86-931.
February 23, 1987, OCTOBER TERM, 1986.
C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 801 F. 2d 46.
holding that false-light invasion of privacy case was governed by law of state in which plaintiff resided and in which defendant conducted and disseminated results of the investigation that formed the subject of the lawsuit
Summary of this case from Konikoff v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Americaapplying New Jersey law
Summary of this case from Diamond Shamrock Refining Marketing v. Mendezapplying New Jersey law
Summary of this case from Romaine v. KallingerFull title:MACHLEDER v. CBS Inc
Court:U.S.
Date published: Feb 23, 1987
RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS Sec. 652A. Although not explicitly required by the Restatement definition, most…
Grimsley v. GuccioneSee Faloona by Frederickson v. Hustler Magazine, Inc., 799 F.2d 1000, 1006 (5th Cir. 1986) (publication by…