From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MacGuire v. Elometa Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 26, 1993
189 A.D.2d 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Summary

recognizing that even where a conversion results in no damages, the plaintiff may still be entitled to nominal damages and "should be given an opportunity to prove at trial any other damages [it] sustained as a result of the conversion"

Summary of this case from Plymouth Venture Partners, II, L.P. v. GTR Source, LLC

Opinion

January 26, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Peter Tom, J.).


Defendants' release of the pledged stock to Elometa before there was proof of full payment of the notes by Elometa and prior notice to the noteholders constituted a conversion by defendants. While defendants urge that there are no damages since they ultimately satisfied all payment obligations which were secured by the stock certificates, nominal damages may be awarded as a result of the conversion and plaintiffs should be given an opportunity to prove at trial any other damages they sustained as a result of the conversion. (See, Silverstein v. Marine Midland Trust Co., 1 A.D.2d 1037.) We also note that any "additional interest" owed is not secured by the stock certificates as the agreements did not so provide.

While the IAS Court granted plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment as to the second cause of action against Elometa only to the extent of imposing liability against Elometa for the additional interest owed, since Elometa has admitted its liability for the exact sums due, plaintiffs are entitled to an award of partial summary judgment on this claim for $205,760.22, which represents the sum admitted less the sum already accepted by certain plaintiffs.

Notably, while certain plaintiffs have accepted a tender offer in full satisfaction of the claims and causes of action as against defendants Elometa, Mensch, and Olson, they have not released Marine Midland Bank from such claims. In fact, said plaintiffs have expressly reserved the right to pursue their claims and causes of action against all other defendants.

We have considered all other claims and find them to be of no merit.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Milonas, Ellerin, Ross and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

MacGuire v. Elometa Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 26, 1993
189 A.D.2d 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

recognizing that even where a conversion results in no damages, the plaintiff may still be entitled to nominal damages and "should be given an opportunity to prove at trial any other damages [it] sustained as a result of the conversion"

Summary of this case from Plymouth Venture Partners, II, L.P. v. GTR Source, LLC
Case details for

MacGuire v. Elometa Corporation

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN A. MacGUIRE et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. ELOMETA CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 26, 1993

Citations

189 A.D.2d 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
592 N.Y.S.2d 730

Citing Cases

Ray v. Fariello

Second, Ray is not required at this stage to demonstrate the damages he sustained because of Defendants'…

Plymouth Venture Partners, II, L.P. v. GTR Source, LLC

To be sure, Defendants’ argument is difficult to square with the rule that "[o]ne who has wrongfully taken…