From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maas & Waldstein Co. v. Walker

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 6, 1928
102 N.J. Eq. 328 (N.J. 1928)

Opinion

Decided February 6th, 1928.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery.

Messrs. Pitney, Hardin Skinner, for the respondent.

Messrs. McCarter English, for the appellants.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry, and reported in 100 N.J. Eq. 224. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Maas & Waldstein Co. v. Walker

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 6, 1928
102 N.J. Eq. 328 (N.J. 1928)
Case details for

Maas & Waldstein Co. v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:MAAS WALDSTEIN COMPANY, respondent, v. HENRY V. WALKER et al., appellants

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 6, 1928

Citations

102 N.J. Eq. 328 (N.J. 1928)
140 A. 921

Citing Cases

SCM Corp. v. Triplett Co.

'The general rule is well established that, unless prohibited by a valid contract, a former employee may…

Irvington Varnish, c., Co. v. Van Norde

The difficulty with the Vice-Chancellor's position is that, in finding an analogy in the case of Ideal…