From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lyons v. Starbucks Coffee Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Sep 24, 2020
Case No. 3:19-cv-2457-S-BT (N.D. Tex. Sep. 24, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 3:19-cv-2457-S-BT

09-24-2020

JIMMY LYONS, Plaintiff, v. STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford dated August 24, 2020. The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED.

SIGNED September 24, 2020.

/s/ _________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lyons v. Starbucks Coffee Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Sep 24, 2020
Case No. 3:19-cv-2457-S-BT (N.D. Tex. Sep. 24, 2020)
Case details for

Lyons v. Starbucks Coffee Co.

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY LYONS, Plaintiff, v. STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Sep 24, 2020

Citations

Case No. 3:19-cv-2457-S-BT (N.D. Tex. Sep. 24, 2020)

Citing Cases

Wright v. Transp. Commc'n Union/IAM

Judge Bryan concluded that “dismissal is appropriate and amendment would be futile.” Id.; see Lyons v.…

Wright v. Transp. Commc'n Union/IAM

Thus, the Court concludes dismissal is appropriate and amendment would be futile. See Lyons v. Starbucks…