From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lyons v. Fox New England Theatres, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut Third Judicial District, New Haven, January Term, 1931
Mar 3, 1931
153 A. 778 (Conn. 1931)

Opinion

Argued January 22d 1931

Decided March 3d 1931.

APPEAL from a finding and award of the compensation commissioner for the fourth district, dismissing the plaintiff's claim, taken to the Superior Court in Fairfield County, Peasley, J.; judgment dismissing the appeal and affirming the award, from which the plaintiff appealed. No error.

George N. Finkelstone, with whom, on the brief, was William J. Lavery, for the appellant (plaintiff).

DeLancey S. Pelgrift, for the appellee (defendant).


The death of the deceased resulted from coronary occlusion. The night before in bed at his home he had suffered severe pain. On the day he died, before going to his work upon the stage of a theatre where he was employed, he visited a physician who diagnosed the condition from which he had been suffering as angina pectoris. He was engaged prior to his death in work about the stage, in shifting scenery and helping to move a heavy movietone machine. After his work was finished for the afternoon he walked about, talked with his wife and the manager of the theatre and apparently suffered no ill effects from his work. About fifteen or twenty minutes after stopping work he died suddenly. The finding of the commissioner was that the heart condition from which the deceased was suffering was not aggravated by his work and that his death was not the result of an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. It was incumbent upon the claimant to prove it to have been at least a reasonable probability that the death of the deceased arose out of his employment. Dombrowski v. Jennings Griffin Co., 103 Conn. 720, 729, 131 A. 745; Madore v. New Departure Mfg. Co., 104 Conn. 709, 714, 134 A. 259. Two of the medical expert witnesses stated that in their judgment this could not be said to be so; the most they could say was that it was reasonably possible. In this condition of the evidence the finding of the commissioner was one which he might reasonably have made and it must stand. The corrections sought either would be insufficient to affect the result or are negatived by the facts he has properly found.


Summaries of

Lyons v. Fox New England Theatres, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut Third Judicial District, New Haven, January Term, 1931
Mar 3, 1931
153 A. 778 (Conn. 1931)
Case details for

Lyons v. Fox New England Theatres, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARTHA LYONS vs. FOX NEW ENGLAND THEATRES, INCORPORATED, ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut Third Judicial District, New Haven, January Term, 1931

Date published: Mar 3, 1931

Citations

153 A. 778 (Conn. 1931)
153 A. 778

Citing Cases

Waskiewicz v. Egan, Administrator

As such, the burden of proving facts showing that the claimant has satisfied these conditions precedent is on…

McDonough v. Connecticut Bank Trust Co.

In order to recover, the claimant must prove causation by a reasonable medical probability. Glenn v. Stop…