From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lynch v. Hillsdale

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 13, 1948
59 A.2d 622 (N.J. 1948)

Opinion

Submitted February 13, 1948 —

Decided May 13, 1948.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported at 136 N.J.L. 129.

For the appellants, Samuel J. Davidson.

For the Borough of Hillsdale, Charles W. Weleck.

For the respondents, Morrison, Lloyd Griggs ( George A. Brown, of counsel).


The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, BODINE, DONGES, WACHENFELD, EASTWOOD, BURLING, WELLS, DILL, FREUND, McLEAN, SCHETTINO, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Lynch v. Hillsdale

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 13, 1948
59 A.2d 622 (N.J. 1948)
Case details for

Lynch v. Hillsdale

Case Details

Full title:JOHN LYNCH ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. BOROUGH OF HILLSDALE ET AL., APPELLANTS

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 13, 1948

Citations

59 A.2d 622 (N.J. 1948)
59 A.2d 622

Citing Cases

Zoning Bd. of Adj. of Green Brook v. Datchko

Judicial relief by this action is available to these plaintiffs to rectify what may reasonably be considered…

Ward v. Scott

Necessarily, the supervisory function is governed by the self-same criterion; it has relation to…