From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lynch v. Granby Holdings, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jul 17, 1995
661 A.2d 98 (Conn. 1995)

Opinion

Decided July 17, 1995


The petition of Granby Holdings, Inc., for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 846 (AC 11222), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Under the circumstances of this case, was the question of the burden of proof on the issue of mitigation of damages properly raised by the plaintiff Daniel Lynch in the trial court?

"2. Should this court reconsider the holding of Pietrorazio v. Santopietro, 185 Conn. 510 (1981), that the failure to raise a claim in a motion to set aside a verdict limits this court to plain error review of that claim?

"3. Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court employ the plain error doctrine to review on appeal the plaintiff's claim regarding the issue of the burden of proof on mitigation of damages?

"4. If the answer to 3. is yes, did the Appellate Court act properly in doing so?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15298.

Andrea Hewitt, in support of the petition.

Timothy Brignole, in opposition.


Summaries of

Lynch v. Granby Holdings, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jul 17, 1995
661 A.2d 98 (Conn. 1995)
Case details for

Lynch v. Granby Holdings, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH L. LYNCH ET AL. v. GRANBY HOLDINGS, INC., ET AL. GRANBY HOLDINGS…

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jul 17, 1995

Citations

661 A.2d 98 (Conn. 1995)
234 Conn. 919

Citing Cases

Moura v. Pulieri

We note that the Supreme Court has recently granted certification to consider whether it should reconsider…