From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lydia v. Henderson

United States District Court, D. South Carolina
Oct 24, 2011
C/A No.: 1:11-23-MBS-SVH (D.S.C. Oct. 24, 2011)

Opinion

C/A No.: 1:11-23-MBS-SVH.

October 24, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging violations of his constitutional rights while he was a pretrial detainee incarcerated at Cherokee County Detention Center ("CCDC"). This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's Motion for Subpoenas [Entry #61]. All pretrial proceedings in this case were referred to the undersigned pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2)(d) (D.S.C.).

Plaintiff's motion for subpoenas requests twelve subpoenas in order to secure the presence of witnesses for Plaintiff. Although a subpoena is the proper method for compelling attendance of a witness at trial, Plaintiff has failed to provide the proper form or the necessary witness fees. There is no requirement under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 that the court pay costs incurred with regard to a subpoena such as witness fees. See Badman v. Stark, 139 F.R.D. 601, 604 (M.D.Pa. 1991) (inmates proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 are not entitled to have their discovery costs underwritten or waived); Johnson v. Hubbard, 698 F.2d 286, 288-291 nn. 2-5 (6th Cir.) (lower courts have no duty to pay fees to secure depositions in civil, non-habeas corpus cases), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 917 (1983); United States Marshals Serv. v. Means, 741 F.2d 1053, 1057 (8th Cir. 1984) (holding that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(c) does not require government payment of witness fees and costs for indigent plaintiffs in § 1983 suits). If Plaintiff wishes to obtain subpoenas, he may do so by contacting the Clerk of Court and providing the Clerk's office with a completed Form AO 88 (Subpoena in a Civil Case), together with the necessary witness fees. Plaintiff will have ample time to submit the same after a trial date is set. Therefore, Plaintiff's motion for subpoenas [Entry #61] is denied at this time with leave to re-file after he has tendered a properly completed AO 88 form and the necessary witness fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lydia v. Henderson

United States District Court, D. South Carolina
Oct 24, 2011
C/A No.: 1:11-23-MBS-SVH (D.S.C. Oct. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Lydia v. Henderson

Case Details

Full title:Claude E. Lydia, Plaintiff, v. Ms. Henderson, Officer; Ms. Luna, Officer…

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina

Date published: Oct 24, 2011

Citations

C/A No.: 1:11-23-MBS-SVH (D.S.C. Oct. 24, 2011)