From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lunsford v. Farmers Insurance Company

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jun 22, 1993
846 P.2d 1206 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)

Summary

In Lunsford v. Farmers Ins. Co., 118 Or App 308, 846 P2d 1206, rev den, 317 Or 162 (1993), we determined that former ORS 743.789(2),renumbered as ORS 742.502(2) (1989), required an insurer to pay underinsurance coverage benefits only if the insured's UM/UIM policy limits exceeded the tortfeasor's policy limits.

Summary of this case from Mid-Century Ins. v. Perkins

Opinion

9007-04008; CA A67556

Argued and submitted October 18, 1991

Affirmed February 17, 1993 Reconsideration denied May 12, 1993 Petition for review denied June 22, 1993 ( 317 Or. 162)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.

S. Ward Greene, Judge pro tempore.

Ronald H. Elzinga, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the briefs was William D. Bailey, Portland.

Patrick N. Rothwell, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Hallmark, Keating Abbott, P.C., Portland.

Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.

Leeson, J., vice Buttler, J., retired.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed.


Plaintiff appeals a summary judgment dismissing her action against defendant for breach of an automobile insurance contract. We affirm.

Plaintiff was injured when the car she was driving collided with one driven by Peterson. Peterson was at fault. Plaintiff obtained a judgment against Peterson for $25,000. Because there were multiple claimants, plaintiff received only $17,500 of the $50,000 per accident limit on Peterson's liability insurance. Peterson paid plaintiff $2,500 in partial satisfaction of the judgment. Plaintiff then sued defendant, her own insurance carrier, for $7,500 in damages, or, alternatively, for an order compelling defendant to arbitrate and to pay her attorney fees pursuant to ORS 742.061. The court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment, and plaintiff appeals.

The sole issue is whether former ORS 743.789(2) (renumbered ORS 742.502(2), requires defendant to pay "underinsurance coverage" on plaintiff's claim. It does not. Under the statute, defendant is required to provide underinsurance coverage only if plaintiff's coverage exceeded Peterson's liability coverage at the time of the accident. Plaintiff acknowledges that her coverage limits were identical to Peterson's.

ORS 742.502(2) provides, in part:

"Offers of uninsured motorist coverage larger than the [statutory minimum] required by ORS 806.070 shall include underinsurance coverage for damages or death caused by accident and arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of a motor vehicle that is insured for an amount that is less than the insured's uninsured motorist coverage."

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Lunsford v. Farmers Insurance Company

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jun 22, 1993
846 P.2d 1206 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)

In Lunsford v. Farmers Ins. Co., 118 Or App 308, 846 P2d 1206, rev den, 317 Or 162 (1993), we determined that former ORS 743.789(2),renumbered as ORS 742.502(2) (1989), required an insurer to pay underinsurance coverage benefits only if the insured's UM/UIM policy limits exceeded the tortfeasor's policy limits.

Summary of this case from Mid-Century Ins. v. Perkins
Case details for

Lunsford v. Farmers Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:Penny L. LUNSFORD, Appellant, v. FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 22, 1993

Citations

846 P.2d 1206 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
846 P.2d 1206

Citing Cases

Mid-Century Ins. v. Perkins

Before the statutory scheme was amended in 1997, this court held that the provisions of ORS 742.502 described…

Fox v. Country Mutual Insurance Co.

Defendants respond that, because both Vincent's liability policy with North Pacific and Fox's UM policy with…