Summary
noting court may "impose filing restrictions on a party for her conduct in [the underlying action] and other cases"
Summary of this case from Pinson v. BerkebileOpinion
Nos. 14–8000 14–8002.
2014-12-3
Holli LUNDAHL, Plaintiff–Appellee v. Ellam HALABI, Defendant–Appellant, and Eli Lilly & Company, Defendant–Appellee, and Michael Johnson; Snell & Wilmer; Cheryl Schrock; US Bank; Donald Halberg; Fortune Magazine; Kai Falkenburg; AOL Inc.; Jeff Semrad; Does 1–10 Inclusive, Defendants. Holli Lundahl, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Ellam Halabi; Eli Lilly & Company; Michael Johnson; Snell & Wilmer; Cheryl Schrock; US Bank; Donald Halberg; Fortune Magazine; Kai Falkenburg; AOL Inc.; Jeff Semrad; Does 1–10 Inclusive, Defendants–Appellees.
Editor's Note: The opinion of the United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, in Lundahl v. Halabi, published in the bound volume at this citation, 773 F.3d 1061, was withdrawn from on-line publication because it was an order and judgment not intended for publication in the Federal Reporter. It will be republished in the Federal Appendix. See 2014 WL 8481105.