From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lumley v. General Mills, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 10, 1997
240 A.D.2d 201 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

June 10, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.).


Triable issues of fact remain concerning whether the driver of the vehicle that was struck in a rear-end collision was negligent in that amongst other things he was tailgating at an inappropriate rate of speed and made a sudden stop; and whether such negligence, if any, contributed to the collision ( see, Malekan v. City Harvest, 234 A.D.2d 94; see also, Darmento v. Pacific Molasses Co., 81 N.Y.2d 985).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Lumley v. General Mills, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 10, 1997
240 A.D.2d 201 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Lumley v. General Mills, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICKA LUMLEY, Respondent, v. GENERAL MILLS, INC., et al., Appellants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 10, 1997

Citations

240 A.D.2d 201 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
658 N.Y.S.2d 32

Citing Cases

Vitale v. V D Transport

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Williams, Tom, Lerner, JJ. The motion was properly denied, there being issues of fact…

Rosado v. Antonio

However, the Court finds that questions of fact exist which preclude the granting of summary judgment to…