From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lukin v. Bruce

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 14, 1998
256 A.D.2d 388 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 14, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Silverman, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, with costs, and the motion is granted.

A vehicle driven by the plaintiff Roslyn Lukin, while stopped near an intersection, was struck in the rear by a school bus owned by the defendant White Plains Bus Company, Inc., and driven by the defendant Gary T. Bruce. The plaintiffs commenced this action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries. After issue was joined and various pre-trial discovery had been completed, including the depositions of Lukin and Bruce, the plaintiffs moved for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability. The Supreme Court denied the motion, and we reverse.

Based on the competent evidence in the record, the defendants, in response to the plaintiffs' prima facie case, failed to satisfy their duty of explanation and to rebut the inference of negligence created by the unexplained rear-end collision ( see, Barile v. Lazzarini, 222 A.D.2d 635; Abramowicz v. Roberto, 220 A.D.2d 374). The unsworn and undated accident statement from Bruce lacked evidentiary value and the allegations set forth therein should not have been considered in opposition to the plaintiffs' motion ( see, Rue v. Stokes, 191 A.D.2d 245; Abrahamsen v. Brockway Glass Co., 156 A.D.2d 615).

Pizzuto, J.P., Joy, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lukin v. Bruce

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 14, 1998
256 A.D.2d 388 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Lukin v. Bruce

Case Details

Full title:ROSLYN LUKIN, Also Known as ROSLYN L. MEHR, et al., Appellants, v. GARY T…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 14, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 388 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
681 N.Y.S.2d 588

Citing Cases

Yi v. JNJ Supply Corp.

The affidavit is written in English, but Kim speaks only Korean. Although the Kim affidavit contains a…

Wolf v. We Transport, Inc.

uncontroverted evidence that the infant plaintiff darted out from between parked cars directly into the path…