From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Luke v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 5, 1942
18 S.E.2d 642 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942)

Opinion

29188.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 5, 1942.

Bastardy; from Carrollton city court — Judge Boykin. June 5, 1941.

Leon Hood, for plaintiff in error. Earl Staples, solicitor, contra.


The indictment sufficiently charged the defendant with the crime of bastardy to withstand the general demurrer, and there is no merit in the contention that the indictment did not charge that the accused was required to give bond in terms of the law. The judge properly overruled the demurrer. McCalman v. State, 121 Ga. 491, 492, 494 ( 49 S.E. 609); Hyden v. State, 40 Ga. 476.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 5, 1942.


The defendant was charged with the offense of misdemeanor, in that he, with force and arms on March 15, 1940, unlawfully "upon the body of one Mattie Lee Smith did wilfully beget a bastard child. She the said Mattie Lee Smith being then an unmarried woman and the said bastard child as begotten by said Julus Luke was born on December 16, 1940, and has become a county charge, and he the said Julus Luke after a bastardy hearing before the Hon. J. W. Stallings, justice of the peace of the 714th Dist. G. M. of Carroll County, Georgia, being committed upon the said bastardy warrant by said judge, did refuse to provide for the maintenance of said child or to give bond for same and elected to give bond to the June term of this court. Contrary to the laws of said State, the good order, peace and dignity thereof." The demurrer to the indictment alleged that it is insufficient to charge bastardy in law because it "fails to set out or allege that this defendant has ever been required to give bond for the support and maintenance of the said bastard child by any justice of the peace as required by law, and hence no legal charge of the violation of any criminal law is contained in said accusation and should be quashed." The demurrer was overruled. The defendant excepted.

The essential elements of the statutory offense here charged (Code, § 74-9901) are: being the father of a bastard child, and refusing to give security for its maintenance and education and the lying in of the mother when required so to do in terms of the law. Sullivan v. State, 114 Ga. 520 ( 40 S.E. 704); Kennedy v. State, 9 Ga. App. 219 ( 70 S.E. 986); Bailey v. State, 52 Ga. App. 302 ( 182 S.E. 924). The indictment having alleged that the defendant is the father of the bastard child, and that he refused to give bond in terms of the law ( Kennedy v. State, supra), the judge properly overruled the general demurrer.

Judgment affirmed. Broyles, C. J., and Gardner, J., concur.


Summaries of

Luke v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 5, 1942
18 S.E.2d 642 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942)
Case details for

Luke v. State

Case Details

Full title:LUKE v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Feb 5, 1942

Citations

18 S.E.2d 642 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942)
18 S.E.2d 642

Citing Cases

Poulos v. McMahan

The offense of bastardy was committed by "the father of a bastard child, and refusing to give security for…