From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lucero v. Donovan

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 5, 1962
300 F.2d 441 (9th Cir. 1962)

Summary

In Lucero v. Donovan, 300 F.2d 441 (9th Cir. 1962), in a per curiam decision, the action was remanded to the District Court for further consideration in the light of Cohen v. Norris, 300 F.2d 24 (9th Cir. 1962).

Summary of this case from Lucero v. Donovan

Opinion

No. 17676.

April 5, 1962.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Leon R. Yankwich, Judge.

Fred Okrand, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Roger Arnebergh, City Atty. and William B. Burge, Deputy City Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.

Before ORR, HAMLEY and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.


The Judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded to the district court for further consideration in the light of the decision of this court in Cohen v. Norris, 300 F.2d 24, decided subsequent to the entry of judgment herein.


Summaries of

Lucero v. Donovan

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 5, 1962
300 F.2d 441 (9th Cir. 1962)

In Lucero v. Donovan, 300 F.2d 441 (9th Cir. 1962), in a per curiam decision, the action was remanded to the District Court for further consideration in the light of Cohen v. Norris, 300 F.2d 24 (9th Cir. 1962).

Summary of this case from Lucero v. Donovan
Case details for

Lucero v. Donovan

Case Details

Full title:Irene LUCERO, Appellant, v. Thomas W. DONOVAN et al., Appellees

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 5, 1962

Citations

300 F.2d 441 (9th Cir. 1962)

Citing Cases

Lucero v. Donovan

This is the second time that this case has been before us. In Lucero v. Donovan, 300 F.2d 441 (9th Cir.…