holding that a licensor's contingent duty to defend infringement suits was a material obligation
Summary of this case from In re Safety-Kleen Corp.No. 85-863.
March 3, 1986.
C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE O'CONNOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Reported below: 756 F. 2d 1043.
holding that a licensor's contingent duty to defend infringement suits was a material obligation
Summary of this case from In re Safety-Kleen Corp.holding that the licensor's contingent duty to defend infringement suits was a material obligation
Summary of this case from In re Exide Technologiesholding that technology licensing agreement was an executory contract where the debtor owed the non-bankrupt continuing duties, inter alia, to notify of patent infringement suits and other uses of or licensing of a certain process and the non-bankrupt owed the debtor reciprocal duties of accounting for and paying royalties for use of the process
Summary of this case from In re Government Securities Corp.applying section 10(b) limitations period to LMRDA claim
Summary of this case from Lewis v. Intern. Broth. of Teamsterslicensing agreement
Summary of this case from In re Chateaugay Corp.Full title:LUBRIZOL ENTERPRISES, INC. v. CANFIELD, BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE FOR RICHMOND…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 3, 1986
Next, Washburn argues that the district court abused its discretion in conditionally granting K.C. Life's…
IN RE QUAD SYSTEMS CORPORATIONAlthough not every court treated the rejection of software licenses in this precise manner, some courts did…