From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LRM Trucking, Inc. v. Baxter Trucking, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
Dec 21, 2020
Case No. 4:20-cv-00091-DN (D. Utah Dec. 21, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 4:20-cv-00091-DN

12-21-2020

LRM TRUCKING, INC., Plaintiff, v. BAXTER TRUCKING, LLC, and PAUL BAXTER, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ENRTY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF'S FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION


Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler

Plaintiff LRM Trucking, Inc. ("LRM") filed its complaint against Defendants Baxter Trucking, LLC ("Baxter Trucking") and Paul Baxter ("Baxter"). Defendants failed to answer and their default has been entered. LRM now moves for default judgment on its first cause of action (breach of contract against Baxter Trucking), with judgment on the other causes of action reserved until such time as LRM is able to obtain necessary information from Defendants (the "Motion").

Order Entering the Default of Defendants, docket no. 11, Oct. 21, 2020.

Motion for Default Judgment on Plaintiff's First Cause of Action, docket no. 12, filed Nov. 24, 2020.

DISCUSSION

"The procedure for obtaining a default judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55 is a two-step process: (a) entry of default by the clerk pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a); and (b) entry of default judgment, by the clerk when the claim is for a sum certain pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(1), and by the court in all other instances pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2)."

DUCivR 55-1.

LRM has completed the first step—entry of default by the clerk.

Order Entering the Default of Defendants, docket no. 11, Oct. 21, 2020.

Based on the following findings of fact, LRM is entitled to entry of default judgment against Baxter Trucking on its first cause of action in the amount of $25,300.00, plus prejudgment interest:

1. On or about July 1, 2017, LRM and Baxter Trucking entered into an Owner Operator Agreement ("Contract") wherein LRM agreed to lease vehicles and trailers to Baxter, together with operators of the vehicles, to transport freight for Baxter Trucking in exchange for payment.

2. LRM fully performed under the Contract by transporting freight at Baxter Trucking's direction.

3. Baxter Trucking breached the Contract by failing to issue any payment to LRM for transportation of freight including, but not limited to, the following loads:

Date

Origin

Destination

Amount

7/17/2019

American Canyon, CA

Las Vegas, NV

$1,300.00

7/18/2019

Las Vegas, NV

West Jordan, UT

$925.00

7/19/2019

Tooele, UT

Commerce City, CO

$1,100.00

7/22/2019

Pueblo, CO

Orem, UT

$1,350.00

7/23/2019

Salt Lake City, UT

Billings, MT

$1,100.00

7/24/2019

Lovell, WY

Orem, UT

$1,000.00

7/25/2019

Grantsville, UT

Laurel, MT

$1,100.00

7/29/2019

Billings, MT

Ozark, MT

$2,400.00

7/30/2019

Ava, MT

Marquette, MI

$1,800.00

7/31/2019

Newberry, MI

Shelby, OH

$1,025.00

8/1/2019

Upper Sandusky, OH

Elk River, MN

$1,500.00

8/3/2019

Elk River, MN

Lawrence, KS

$1,200.00

8/6/2019

Kansas City, KS

Madison, WI

$1,000.00

8/8/2019

Reedsburg, WI

Grand Prairie, TX

$2,000.00

8/9/2019

Waxahachie, TX

Bentonville, AR

$900.00

8/12/2019

Fort Smith, AR

Clintonville, WI

$1,800.00

8/13/2019

Daggett, MI

Mt. Vernon, IL

$1,100.00

8/14/2019

Mt. Vernon, IL

Diana, GA

$1,400.00

8/19/2019

Charlotte, SC

Kaftan, MY

$1,300.00

Total

$25,300.00

(collectively, the "Unpaid Freight").

Declaration of Robert Marshall at ¶ 3, docket no. 12-1, filed Nov. 24, 2020.

Id. at ¶ 4.

Id. at ¶ 5.

Judgment on LRM's other causes of action is reserved. "When an action presents more than one claim for relief . . . the court may direct entry of a final judgment as to one or more, but fewer than all, claims or parties only if the court expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay."

There is no just reason for delay here. The amount of damages under LRM's first cause of action is amenable to proof by documents in LRM's possession. The amount of damages under LRM's other causes of action, however, can only be established by information in Defendants' possession. LRM has been unable to obtain that information because Defendants have refused to appear in this action. It would be unjust to require LRM to wait to recover on its first cause of action until it is able to get the information it needs from Defendants to obtain a default judgment on its other causes of action. Defendants should not be rewarded for their refusal to appear in this action.

Furthermore, there is no danger here of piecemeal appeals, because the factual and legal issues raised by LRM's first cause of action are distinct from LRM's other claims.

See Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Gen. Elec. Co., 446 U.S. 1, 8 (1980) (holding that in determining whether "there is no just reason for delay," district courts "must take into account judicial administrative interests as well as the equities involved.")

ORDER

Based on the foregoing, and for good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. A final default judgment against Baxter Trucking on LRM's first cause of action will be entered in the amount of $25,300.00, plus prejudgment interest of $3,409.13 under Utah Code Ann. §15-1-1 from the date of each invoice through November 24, 2020.

Motion for Default Judgment on Plaintiff's First Cause of Action, docket no. 12, filed Nov. 24, 2020.

Signed December 21, 2020.

BY THE COURT

/s/_________

David Nuffer

United States District Judge


Summaries of

LRM Trucking, Inc. v. Baxter Trucking, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
Dec 21, 2020
Case No. 4:20-cv-00091-DN (D. Utah Dec. 21, 2020)
Case details for

LRM Trucking, Inc. v. Baxter Trucking, LLC

Case Details

Full title:LRM TRUCKING, INC., Plaintiff, v. BAXTER TRUCKING, LLC, and PAUL BAXTER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

Date published: Dec 21, 2020

Citations

Case No. 4:20-cv-00091-DN (D. Utah Dec. 21, 2020)