From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loyd v. McDowell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 13, 2020
Case No. 18-cv-07228-HSG (N.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 18-cv-07228-HSG

10-13-2020

DANIEL RAY LOYD, Petitioner, v. NEIL MCDOWELL, Respondent.


ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO FILE UNDER SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 27

Petitioner, a state prisoner, has filed this habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Dkt. No. 1. On January 31, 2019, the Court ordered Respondent to show cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted based on Petitioner's cognizable claims. Dkt. No. 10. Respondent has filed an answer to the order to show cause (Dkt. Nos. 25, 26) and has requested to file under seal the Lake County Probation Officer's Report, which is located at pages 2156-83 of the state court clerk's transcript on appeal and is lodged as Exhibit 23 to the Answer. Dkt. No. 27. Respondent argues that Cal. R. Ct. 8.45-8.47 require that personal information in a probation report be kept confidential, citing People v. Connor, 115 Cal.App.4th 669 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004). Connor holds that Cal. Penal Code § 1203.05 renders probation reports, or at least any detailed personal information contained in them, conditionally confidential sixty days after judgment is pronounced or probation granted, whichever is earlier. Connor, 115 Cal. App. 4th at 685.

In accordance with Habeas Rule 2(a) and Rule 25(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk of the Court is directed to substitute Warden Neil McDowell as Respondent because he is petitioner's current custodian. --------

There is a strong presumption favoring the public's right of access to court records which should be overridden only for a compelling reason. Hagestad v. Tragesser, 49 F.3d 1430, 1433- 34 (9th Cir. 1995). "In general, compelling reasons sufficient to outweigh the public's interest in disclosure and justify sealing court records exist when such court files might have become a vehicle for improper purposes, such as the use of records to gratify private spite, promote public scandal, circulate libelous statements, or release trade secrets." Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1179 (9th Cir. 2006) (quotation omitted).

Here, respondent seeks to file under seal the Lake County Probation Officer's Report because this document contains personal information. Probation reports are "designed to contain highly personal information about the defendant, including his or her arrest record; family background; and employment, military, medical, and psychological histories." Connor, 115 Cal. App. 4th at 681. This type of personal information "could become a vehicle for improper purposes" and justifies sealing the exhibits. Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1179. Thus, the Court finds a compelling need for this document to remain confidential. The Court GRANTS respondent's motion to file Exhibit 23 to the answer to the order to show cause under seal. Exhibit 23 shall remain under seal until the conclusion of this case and any appellate proceedings. If counsel for Respondent does not request that these documents be returned following the conclusion of this case and any appellate proceedings, these documents will be destroyed in conformance with the normal records destruction policy of the United States Courts.

This order terminates Dkt. No. 27.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 10/13/2020

/s/_________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Loyd v. McDowell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 13, 2020
Case No. 18-cv-07228-HSG (N.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2020)
Case details for

Loyd v. McDowell

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL RAY LOYD, Petitioner, v. NEIL MCDOWELL, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 13, 2020

Citations

Case No. 18-cv-07228-HSG (N.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2020)