From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lowman v. Perlman

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Aug 29, 2008
9:06-CV-0422 (LEK/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 29, 2008)

Opinion

9:06-CV-0422 (LEK/RFT).

August 29, 2008


DECISION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on August 4, 2008 by the Honorable Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3 of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 54). After ten days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the entire file to the undersigned, including the objections by Plaintiff Vincent Lowman, which were filed on August 8, 2008. Objections (Dkt. No. 55).

It is the duty of this Court to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). "A [district] judge . . . may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." Id. This Court has considered the objections and has undertaken a de novo review of the record and has determined that the Report-Recommendation should be approved for the reasons stated therein.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 54) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further

ORDERED, that Defendants' Motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 42) is GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED, that Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED in its entirety; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lowman v. Perlman

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Aug 29, 2008
9:06-CV-0422 (LEK/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 29, 2008)
Case details for

Lowman v. Perlman

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT LOWMAN, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH PERLMAN, Superintendent of Mid-State…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Aug 29, 2008

Citations

9:06-CV-0422 (LEK/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 29, 2008)

Citing Cases

Youngblood v. Glasser

Generally speaking, hemorrhoids do not constitute a serious medical condition, the delay in treatment of…

Walker v. Fischer

Magistrate Judge Peebles correctly concluded that the complaint does not allege facts from which one could…