From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lowery v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States
Jun 24, 1999
527 U.S. 1031 (1999)

Summary

affirming district court's decision to refuse discovery of "the data runs, computer programs and codes used by" the testifying expert because they were developed by non-testifying experts

Summary of this case from United States ex rel Morsell v. Nortonlifelock, Inc.

Opinion

No. 98-972.

06-24-1999

LOWERY ET AL. v. CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC.


C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Kolstad v. American Dental Assn., ante, p. 526.


Summaries of

Lowery v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States
Jun 24, 1999
527 U.S. 1031 (1999)

affirming district court's decision to refuse discovery of "the data runs, computer programs and codes used by" the testifying expert because they were developed by non-testifying experts

Summary of this case from United States ex rel Morsell v. Nortonlifelock, Inc.
Case details for

Lowery v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LOWERY ET AL. v. CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Jun 24, 1999

Citations

527 U.S. 1031 (1999)
119 S. Ct. 2388
144 L. Ed. 2d 790

Citing Cases

Stamm v. New York City Transit Authority

However, this Court notes that at least one court in this Circuit has held that a plaintiff cannot recover…

K.C. v. Chappaqua Cent. Sch. Dist.

This conclusion accords with the Second Circuit's instruction that where deference is due to a state…