From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lowe v. Elite Recovery Solutions, L.P.

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 24, 2008
CIV-S-07-0627 JAM GGH (E.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2008)

Opinion

CIV-S-07-0627 JAM GGH.

September 24, 2008


ORDER


On February 5, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.

Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed February 5, 2007, are ADOPTED; and

2. Plaintiffs' motion for entry of default judgment is GRANTED. Judgment is rendered in the amount of $10,234.50.


Summaries of

Lowe v. Elite Recovery Solutions, L.P.

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 24, 2008
CIV-S-07-0627 JAM GGH (E.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2008)
Case details for

Lowe v. Elite Recovery Solutions, L.P.

Case Details

Full title:TRAVIS LOWE, Plaintiff, v. ELITE RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, L.P., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 24, 2008

Citations

CIV-S-07-0627 JAM GGH (E.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2008)

Citing Cases

Davis v. Creditors Interchange Receivable Mgt.

District courts elsewhere have reached the same conclusion — that courts must determine actual damages under…