From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Love v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Feb 12, 1992
601 A.2d 141 (Md. 1992)

Opinion

No. 89, September Term, 1991.

February 12, 1992.

Certiorari to Court of Special Appeals (Circuit Court for Prince George's County — Judge James P. Salmon).

Bradford C. Peabody, Asst. Public Defender (Stephen E. Harris, Public Defender, both on brief), Baltimore, for petitioner.

Ann N. Bosse, Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., both on brief), Baltimore, for respondent.

Argued before MURPHY, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWKSY, McAULIFFE, CHASANOW and KARWACKI, JJ., and CHARLES E. ORTH, Jr., Associate Judge of the Court of Appeals (retired), specially assigned.


ORDER

The petition for writ of certiorari in the above entitled case having been granted and heard, it is this 12th day of February, 1992

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.


Summaries of

Love v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Feb 12, 1992
601 A.2d 141 (Md. 1992)
Case details for

Love v. State

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL HARLIN LOVE v. STATE OF MARYLAND

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Feb 12, 1992

Citations

601 A.2d 141 (Md. 1992)
601 A.2d 141

Citing Cases

Love v. State

It was subsequently dismissed, on February 12, 1992, as having been improvidently granted. Love v. State, 325…