In Love v. Ramsey, 139 Mich. 47, 102 N.W. 279, 280, it is said: "Under the decisions of this court the members of a corporation are not liable where it is a corporation de facto, though not de jure, and the plaintiff has dealt with it as a corporation.
Summary of this case from Thompson v. Park Sav. Bank2110156
2012-01-11
Timothy M. Love v. Lee Ramsey
Disposition: Dismissed.
In Love v. Ramsey, 139 Mich. 47, 102 N.W. 279, 280, it is said: "Under the decisions of this court the members of a corporation are not liable where it is a corporation de facto, though not de jure, and the plaintiff has dealt with it as a corporation.
Summary of this case from Thompson v. Park Sav. BankFull title:Timothy M. Love v. Lee Ramsey
Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.
Date published: Jan 11, 2012
Therefore they are estopped to deny the legality of the bank's actions and cannot hold the directors or…
PIM v. STEINBICHLER OPTICAL TECH. U.S.A.See eg. City of Kalamazoo v. Kalamazoo Heat, Light Power, Co, 124 Mich 74, 82-83; 82 NW 811 (1900) (stating…