From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Louis v. Boening

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle
Nov 13, 2007
Case No. C06-1169RSL (W.D. Wash. Nov. 13, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. C06-1169RSL.

November 13, 2007


ORDER GRANTING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY


This matter comes before the Court on petitioner's "Request for Certificate of Appealability." Under the amended version of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), a petitioner may not appeal the denial of a habeas corpus petition unless the district court or the Ninth Circuit issues a certificate of appealability identifying the particular issues that may be pursued on appeal. United States v. Asrar, 116 F.3d 1268 (9th Cir. 1997).

To obtain a certificate of appealability, the petitioner must make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. "Obviously the petitioner need not show that he should prevail on the merits. He has already failed in that endeavor."Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 893 n. 4 (1983). Rather, he must demonstrate that the resolution of the habeas petition is debatable among reasonable jurists or that the issues presented were "adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further."Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483-84 (2000).

Having reviewed the record in this case, including the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Mary Alice Theiler, the Court finds that petitioner's first ground for relief, that his convictions for both kidnapping and robbery violated the Double Jeopardy provision of the Constitution, is debatable among reasonable jurists. Petitioner's motion for a certificate of appealability on that ground is, therefore, GRANTED.


Summaries of

Louis v. Boening

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle
Nov 13, 2007
Case No. C06-1169RSL (W.D. Wash. Nov. 13, 2007)
Case details for

Louis v. Boening

Case Details

Full title:JOE N. LOUIS, Petitioner, v. RON VAN BOENING, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle

Date published: Nov 13, 2007

Citations

Case No. C06-1169RSL (W.D. Wash. Nov. 13, 2007)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. Hill

Other courts considering the issue have reached the same result. See Louis v. Van Boening, 2007 WL 2686842 *8…