In Justus v. Maynard, the Tenth Circuit again analyzed a claim of one of the prisoners that was a plaintiff in Longstreth to decide whether the individual defendants were entitled to qualified immunity—the exact issue here.
Summary of this case from Stewart v. Beach93-5099.
June 14, 1994.
Appeal from N.D.Okl.
Decisions without Published Opinions Affirmed.
In Justus v. Maynard, the Tenth Circuit again analyzed a claim of one of the prisoners that was a plaintiff in Longstreth to decide whether the individual defendants were entitled to qualified immunity—the exact issue here.
Summary of this case from Stewart v. Beachstating that defining the right at issue as "an inmate's general right to religious freedom within the constraints of a prison system" was too broad
Summary of this case from Stewart v. BeachFull title:Loughridge v. Allen
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Date published: Jun 14, 1994
Thus, defining the right as the freedom to practice religion in prison is too broad to "help in determining…
Harmon v. ColvinThe ALJ's decision "is not capable of meaningful review because it is internally inconsistent and…