From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loubet v. Loubet

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jun 8, 1967
155 Conn. 695 (Conn. 1967)

Opinion

Argued June 6, 1967

Decided June 8, 1967

Action on a promissory note, brought to the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County at Stamford, where the court, Tierney, J., granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the complaint and rendered judgment for the plaintiff on the complaint, from which the defendant appealed. No error.

The appellant filed a motion for reargument which was denied.

Stephen N. Schaffer, with whom, on the brief, was Richard S. Weinstein, for the appellant (defendant).

J. Richard Fay, with whom, on the brief, was Kenneth Garfunkel, for the appellee (plaintiff).


The opposing affidavit of the defendant contained no recital of facts which would be admissible in evidence, nor was any documentary proof submitted to show that there was a genuine issue as to any material fact alleged in the complaint. Practice Book §§ 300, 303; Kasowitz v. Mutual Construction Co., 154 Conn. 607, 613, 228 A.2d 149; Rathkopf v. Pearson, 148 Conn. 260, 263, 170 A.2d 135.


Summaries of

Loubet v. Loubet

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jun 8, 1967
155 Conn. 695 (Conn. 1967)
Case details for

Loubet v. Loubet

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH LOUBET v. ALBERT E. LOUBET

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jun 8, 1967

Citations

155 Conn. 695 (Conn. 1967)
203 A.2d 552

Citing Cases

United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment Commission

Practice Book 299. "Pursuant to 300 of the Practice Book, affidavits filed in connection with a motion for…

Procurement, LLC v. Nicholas Ahuja, Executor of Estate of Gurpreet Ahuja

We have repeatedly held that " (i)n order to oppose successfully a motion for summary judgment, the opposing…