From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lott v. Lott

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 24, 1949
63 A.2d 705 (N.J. 1949)

Opinion

Argued January 17, 1949 —

Decided January 24, 1949.

Mr. S. Sidney Silver argued the cause for the petitioner-appellant.

Mr. Charles M. Grosman argued the cause for the defendant-respondent ( Messrs. Robert D. and Charles M. Grosman, attorneys).


We concur in the conclusion reached in the court below that the appellant failed to prove and corroborate the allegations of her petition. The decree is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance: Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices CASE, HEHER, WACHENFELD, BURLING, and ACKERSON — 6.

For reversal: None.


Summaries of

Lott v. Lott

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 24, 1949
63 A.2d 705 (N.J. 1949)
Case details for

Lott v. Lott

Case Details

Full title:ANNA LOTT, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM LOTT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jan 24, 1949

Citations

63 A.2d 705 (N.J. 1949)
63 A.2d 705

Citing Cases

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services

Robinson v. Hodge, 1 N.J. 357, 63 A.2d 804 (1949). Lott v. Lott, 1 N.J. 356, 63 A.2d 705 (1949). Coyle v.…