From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopez v. Janda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 8, 2015
NO. EDCV 13-1196-DOC (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2015)

Summary

discussing CALCRIM 372

Summary of this case from Evans v. Spearman

Opinion

NO. EDCV 13-1196-DOC (MAN)

06-08-2015

ADAM LEE LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. JANDA, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ("Petition"), all of the records herein, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and Petitioner's Objections to the Report. The Court has conducted a de novo review of those matters to which objections have been stated in writing.

Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is DENIED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 8, 2015

/s/_________

DAVID O. CARTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lopez v. Janda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 8, 2015
NO. EDCV 13-1196-DOC (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2015)

discussing CALCRIM 372

Summary of this case from Evans v. Spearman
Case details for

Lopez v. Janda

Case Details

Full title:ADAM LEE LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. JANDA, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 8, 2015

Citations

NO. EDCV 13-1196-DOC (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2015)

Citing Cases

United States v. Robeson

A number of other courts and commentators have reached the same conclusion regarding the impact of Berghuis…

Evans v. Spearman

Moreover, federal courts have rejected similar arguments, finding that CALCRIM 372 does not create…