From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loomis Jr. v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 1, 1911
142 App. Div. 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)

Summary

In Loomis v. Jackson, 6 W. Va. 613, a special court, created and authorized by the Legislature to hear and determine certain types of election contests, recognized the presumption that all officers and other persons engaged in conducting elections or in making returns and certifying results acted in accordance with the law until the contrary is shown.

Summary of this case from State v. Mills

Opinion

January, 1911.


Interlocutory judgment modified so as to authorize the defendants to amend answer upon payment of costs at Special Term, and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs in this court, which must also be paid as a condition to the defendants' right to amend answer.


Summaries of

Loomis Jr. v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 1, 1911
142 App. Div. 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)

In Loomis v. Jackson, 6 W. Va. 613, a special court, created and authorized by the Legislature to hear and determine certain types of election contests, recognized the presumption that all officers and other persons engaged in conducting elections or in making returns and certifying results acted in accordance with the law until the contrary is shown.

Summary of this case from State v. Mills
Case details for

Loomis Jr. v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:John R. Loomis, Jr., Respondent, v. Edgar R. Jackson and Another…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1911

Citations

142 App. Div. 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)

Citing Cases

Hervey v. Crouch

In pleading fraud it is a well established rule that every act, fact and intent which necessarily entered…

Bailey v. Fly

It must not be inconsistent with the original pleading, or add new matter, unless the provision permitting an…