Opinion
Argued December 22, 1885
Decided January 26, 1886
James Lansing for appellant.
Esek Cowen for respondent.
EARL, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur, except RAPALLO, ANDREWS and DANFORTH, JJ., dissenting.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Long v. Millerton Iron Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 26, 1886
4 N.E. 735 (N.Y. 1886)
Summaries of
Long v. Millerton Iron Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 26, 1886
4 N.E. 735 (N.Y. 1886)
Case details for
Long v. Millerton Iron Company
Case Details
Full title:GEORGE W. LONG, Appellant, v . THE MILLERTON IRON COMPANY, Respondent
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jan 26, 1886
Citations
4 N.E. 735 (N.Y. 1886)
4 N.E. 735
1 N.Y. St. Rptr. 38
Citing Cases
Van Derhoef v. Hartmann
The parol evidence must be consistent with and not contradictory of the written instrument. * * * The…
Thomas et al. v. ScuttWhere, however, instead of a mere transfer or assignment, there is a contract, appearing on its face to be…