From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Long v. Davis

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 21, 1948
169 F.2d 982 (9th Cir. 1948)

Opinion

No. 12024.

September 21, 1948.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division; Paul J. McCormick, Judge.

Action between Mary F. Long and Donald D. Davis and others. From a judgment granting a new trial the former appeals. On motion to dismiss the appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

Hunter Liljestrom, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Milton V. Backman, of Salt Lake City, Utah, for appellees.

Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS and BONE, Circuit Judges.


This appeal is from a motion granting a new trial. The appeal was taken on July 9, 1948. Appellees moved to dismiss it on the ground that the order was not a final decision, within the meaning of § 128(a) of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 225(a), 1946 Edition, then in effect, and hence was not appealable. The motion is well founded. Sentinel v. Dinwiddie, 7 Cir., 41 F.2d 57; Hunt v. United States, 10 Cir., 53 F.2d 333; East Erie Commercial Co. v. Denial, 3 Cir., 66 F.2d 555; Frank Mercantile Corp. v. Prudential Ins. Co., 3 Cir., 115 F.2d 496. Accordingly, it is granted and the appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Long v. Davis

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 21, 1948
169 F.2d 982 (9th Cir. 1948)
Case details for

Long v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:LONG v. DAVIS et al

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 21, 1948

Citations

169 F.2d 982 (9th Cir. 1948)

Citing Cases

United States v. Dior

It is settled in this circuit that new trial orders in civil cases are not appealable until after retrial…

Tsoleas v. Hege

This is an appeal from an order setting aside the verdict of a jury and awarding a new trial. It is well…