From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Long Branch v. State Board Tax Appeals

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 14, 1936
184 A. 735 (N.J. 1936)

Opinion

Submitted February 14, 1936 —

Decided May 14, 1936.

On appeal from the Supreme Court.

For the appellant borough of Allenhurst, Richard W. Stout.

For the appellant borough of Interlaken, Isaiah Matlack ( Frank A. Boettner, Jules E. Tepper and William J. O'Hagan, of counsel).

For the respondent city of Long Branch, Jacob Steinbach, Jr.

For the respondent borough of Deal, T. Cyril Butler.

For the respondent township of Dover, Ocean county, David A. Veeder.


The judgment under review, in this case, is reversed, for the reasons stated in Town of West Orange et al. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 115 N.J.L. 396 ; 180 Atl. Rep. 770, and affirmed by this court in 116 N.J.L. 414.

For affirmance — None.

For reversal — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, LLOYD, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 12.


Summaries of

Long Branch v. State Board Tax Appeals

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 14, 1936
184 A. 735 (N.J. 1936)
Case details for

Long Branch v. State Board Tax Appeals

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF LONG BRANCH, PROSECUTOR-RESPONDENT, v. STATE BOARD OF TAX APPEALS…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 14, 1936

Citations

184 A. 735 (N.J. 1936)
184 A. 735

Citing Cases

N.J. Bell Telephone Co. v. Newark

Analogy, however, may well be drawn from two recent cases involving assessments made by the state tax…