From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loeb v. Nassau Electric Railroad Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1933
240 App. Div. 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Opinion

November, 1933.


Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion, there was sufficient proof of the retainer and acceptance thereof by the trial justice as counsel for plaintiff, and all proceedings before him, therefore, were without jurisdiction and void. ( People v. Haas, 105 App. Div. 119; People v. Conner, 142 N.Y. 130; People v. Whitridge, No. 2, 144 App. Div. 493; Seaward v. Tasker, 143 N.Y. Supp. 257 [not officially published]; Oakley v. Aspinwall, 3 N.Y. 547; Elmira Realty Co. v. Gibson, 103 App. Div. 140.) Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Loeb v. Nassau Electric Railroad Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1933
240 App. Div. 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for

Loeb v. Nassau Electric Railroad Company

Case Details

Full title:EUGENIE LOEB and EDMUND LOEB, Appellants, v. NASSAU ELECTRIC RAILROAD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1933

Citations

240 App. Div. 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Citing Cases

Eagle Lumber & Supply Co. v. De Weese

Our registry laws are intended only for the protection of purchasers and creditors. Loeb v. R.R. Co., 60…