From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lockner v. Pierce Cnty.

Supreme Court of Washington.
Oct 4, 2017
189 Wn. 2d 1009 (Wash. 2017)

Opinion

No. 94643-4

10-04-2017

Margie LOCKNER, Respondent, v. PIERCE COUNTY, et al., Petitioners.


ORDER

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon-McCloud, considered at its October 3, 2017, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is granted and review of the issues raised in the Respondent's answer to the petition is also granted. Any party may serve and file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of this order, see RAP 13.7(d).

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

Lockner v. Pierce Cnty.

Supreme Court of Washington.
Oct 4, 2017
189 Wn. 2d 1009 (Wash. 2017)
Case details for

Lockner v. Pierce Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:Margie LOCKNER, Respondent, v. PIERCE COUNTY, et al., Petitioners.

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Oct 4, 2017

Citations

189 Wn. 2d 1009 (Wash. 2017)
189 Wash. 2d 1009
403 P.3d 45

Citing Cases

Lockner v. Pierce Cnty.

We granted review of both issues. Lockner v. Pierce County , 189 Wash.2d 1009, 403 P.3d 45 (2017).…