From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lobello v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 24, 1945
62 N.E.2d 243 (N.Y. 1945)

Summary

In Lobello v. City of New York (294 N.Y. 816) we affirmed the Appellate Division (268 App. Div. 880), which modified the determination below by granting judgment in favor of the City of New York against the contractor as prayed for in the city's cross complaint.

Summary of this case from Middleton v. City of New York

Opinion

Argued April 19, 1945

Decided May 24, 1945

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, MacCRATE, J.

Ignatius M. Wilkinson, Corporation Counsel ( Murray Sendler of counsel), for City of New York, defendant-appellant and respondent. James J. McLoughlin, Julius S. Christensen and Thomas F. Harrigan for Manufacturers Trust Company, defendant-appellant and respondent.

Joseph F. Hanley and John W. Trapp for Frank Ceva Sons, Inc., defendant-appellant and respondent.

Leonard Acker, Bernard Pizzitola and Frank N. Percaccia for plaintiff-respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, and DYE, JJ. Taking no part: THACHER, J.


Summaries of

Lobello v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 24, 1945
62 N.E.2d 243 (N.Y. 1945)

In Lobello v. City of New York (294 N.Y. 816) we affirmed the Appellate Division (268 App. Div. 880), which modified the determination below by granting judgment in favor of the City of New York against the contractor as prayed for in the city's cross complaint.

Summary of this case from Middleton v. City of New York
Case details for

Lobello v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:VITO LOBELLO, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Appellants and…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 24, 1945

Citations

62 N.E.2d 243 (N.Y. 1945)
62 N.E.2d 243

Citing Cases

D'Ambrosio v. City of New York

benefit of the owner of the abutting premises, however, the rule has developed that the municipality may…

Zeuner v. Village of Bronxville

Delval Construction Corporation's motion to dismiss the third-party complaint, on the ground that it does not…