From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lobby Display Frame Corporation v. Steinberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 17, 1952
281 App. Div. 678 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

December 17, 1952.

Present — Peck, P.J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. Giving the complaint every favorable inference in construction, we think it sufficient. Upon the trial, however, plaintiff will be required to establish fraud in obtaining the credit through the instrumentality of the corporation, as distinguished from the use of the corporate entity as a legitimate means of protection.


Summaries of

Lobby Display Frame Corporation v. Steinberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 17, 1952
281 App. Div. 678 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

Lobby Display Frame Corporation v. Steinberg

Case Details

Full title:LOBBY DISPLAY FRAME CORPORATION, Respondent, v. NATHAN V. STEINBERG…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 17, 1952

Citations

281 App. Div. 678 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Citing Cases

Lippman Packing Corp. v. Rose

Under well-known principles of law they are liable." (See, also, Hotaling v. Leach & Co., 126 Misc. 845;…

Lippman Packing Corp. v. Rose

Under well-known principles of law they are liable." (See, also, Hotaling v. Leach Co., 126 Misc. 845; Matis…