From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lo Piccolo v. Oyster Bay, Department of Parks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 26, 1999
260 A.D.2d 606 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

April 26, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff was injured while ice skating at a Town of Oyster Bay skating rink. The plaintiff alleged that the ice was not maintained in proper condition. However, the plaintiff's own testimony at a pretrial hearing indicated that he had actual knowledge of defects in the surface of the ice and nevertheless continued to skate. Under these circumstances, the doctrine of assumption of the risk mandates the granting of summary judgment dismissing the complaint ( see, Byrne v. Westchester County, 178 A.D.2d 575).

Mangano, P. J., H. Miller, Feuerstein, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lo Piccolo v. Oyster Bay, Department of Parks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 26, 1999
260 A.D.2d 606 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Lo Piccolo v. Oyster Bay, Department of Parks

Case Details

Full title:JAMES Lo PICCOLO, Respondent, v. TOWN OF OYSTER BAY, DEPARTMENT OF PARKS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 26, 1999

Citations

260 A.D.2d 606 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
688 N.Y.S.2d 670

Citing Cases

Z.D. v. BORO PARK TOWNHOUSES ASSOC., LP

Defendants point to the infant plaintiff's age, nearly 14 at the time of the accident, and that she had been…

Stanger v. M T Pretzel

ORDERED that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs. The defendant established its entitlement to…