From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

L.M. Chev. Co. v. Finance Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 29, 1959
169 Ohio St. 181 (Ohio 1959)

Opinion

No. 35732

Decided April 29, 1959.

Supreme Court — Affirmance — Judges equally divided — Suit for damages — Seizure and sale of motor vehicle on execution — Certificate of Title Act — Equitable estoppel.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County.

Mr. Frank B. McClelland, for appellee.

Mr. Phillip V. Stout and Mr. John R. Dennis, for appellant.



This action originated in the Columbus Municipal Court to recover money damages in a specified sum. The trial court took the position that a section of the Certificate of Title Act (Section 4505.04, Revised Code) was controlling and rendered judgment for defendant.

The Court of Appeals, on appeal, held that the doctrine of equitable estoppel was applicable, reversed the judgment of the trial court, and remanded the cause with instructions to enter judgment for plaintiff.

The allowance of a motion to certify the record brings the cause to this court for review.

It appearing that the judges of the court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of this case (one judge not participating) and are for that reason unable to agree on a judgment, the entry of that fact constitutes an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals. Section 2, Article IV, Ohio Constitution.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

L.M. Chev. Co. v. Finance Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 29, 1959
169 Ohio St. 181 (Ohio 1959)
Case details for

L.M. Chev. Co. v. Finance Co.

Case Details

Full title:LEX MAYERS CHEVROLET CO., INC., APPELLEE v. BUCKEYE FINANCE CO., APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Apr 29, 1959

Citations

169 Ohio St. 181 (Ohio 1959)
158 N.E.2d 360

Citing Cases

Shaheen v. Vassilakis

It is available only in defense of a legal or equitable right or claim made in good faith and should not be…

Psychiatric Hosp., Inc. v. Review Bd.

The gravamen of this argument is that the CON Review Board was acting in an appellate capacity when it…