Lloyd v. Weinstock

Full title: JOHN N. LLOYD, RESPONDENT, v. ABRAM WEINSTOCK, APPELLANT

Court: Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 16, 1927

137 A. 917 (N.J. 1927)

137 A. 917

Opinion

Submitted February 11, 1927 —

Decided May 16, 1927.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 4 N.J. Mis. R. 953.

For the respondent, William P. Hurley.

For the appellant, Carl Olsan.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.