From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

L.J.H. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 3, 1993
627 So. 2d 593 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-03692.

December 3, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Robert F. Michael, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dell H. Edwards, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


L.J.H. appeals the order requiring her to pay restitution in the total amount of $1058.00 at the rate of $88.00 per month. She contends the trial court erred in not conditioning the payment of restitution upon her obtaining earnings from employment that will enable her to comply with the order. J.M.H. v. State, 589 So.2d 394 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). We agree.

Accordingly, we affirm the order of restitution but remand with directions that it be modified to make payment contingent upon obtaining earnings from employment, which L.J.H. must make every reasonable effort to secure.

THREADGILL and BLUE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

L.J.H. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 3, 1993
627 So. 2d 593 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

L.J.H. v. State

Case Details

Full title:L.J.H., A CHILD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Dec 3, 1993

Citations

627 So. 2d 593 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

J.A.B. v. State

We affirm. We have voted to consider this case en banc and to recede from R.S.M. v. State, 910 So.2d 361…

S.P. v. State

Furthermore, the trial court's new order of restitution should be contingent upon S.P. obtaining employment…