From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lively v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Georgia
Nov 13, 1952
73 S.E.2d 90 (Ga. 1952)

Opinion

18026.

SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 13, 1952.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 13, 1952.

Boundaries. Before Judge Pharr. Fulton Superior Court. September 5, 1952.

Leon Bolling and Wood Tallant, for plaintiff in error.

Wm. E. Spence, Harris, Henson Gower and Harris Gower, contra.


A writ of error will not lie to the Supreme Court to correct a judgment of the superior court where, on the trial of the case, "It was stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the parties that neither party requires proof of title on the part of the other party, and that the issue in the case is the correct location of the dividing line between the property of the plaintiff and the property of the defendants, and if the plaintiff should prevail, the additional question of damages" for cutting shade trees and making excavations on property alleged to belong to the plaintiff, since the Court of Appeals, and not this court, has jurisdiction. Frey v. Thompson, 147 Ga. 559 ( 94 S.E. 999); Johnson v. Woodward Lumber Co., 202 Ga. 288 ( 42 S.E.2d 639); Ledford v. Hill, 206 Ga. 304 ( 57 S.E.2d 77); Miller v. Ray, 208 Ga. 27 ( 64 S.E.2d 449); Whaley v. Ellis, 209 Ga. 147 ( 71 S.E.2d 209).

Transferred to the Court of Appeals. All the justices concur

No. 18026. SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 13, 1952 — DECIDED NOVEMBER 13, 1952.


Summaries of

Lively v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Georgia
Nov 13, 1952
73 S.E.2d 90 (Ga. 1952)
Case details for

Lively v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:LIVELY v. THOMPSON et al

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Nov 13, 1952

Citations

73 S.E.2d 90 (Ga. 1952)
209 Ga. 425

Citing Cases

State Highway Dept. v. Ga. S. F. R. Co.

Since it is not alleged that the parties are adjoining landowners, this case does not fall within that line…

Smith v. Morgan

The Court of Appeals and not this court has jurisdiction of cases involving the location of disputed land…