From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Little v. Wirth

New York Superior Court — General Term
Dec 1, 1893
6 Misc. 301 (N.Y. Misc. 1893)

Opinion

December, 1893.

Joseph H. Fargis, for plaintiff (appellant).

Welch Daniels ( George S. Daniels, of counsel), for defendant (respondent).


The judgment appealed from was entered in due conformity with the order sustaining the demurrer, and the notice of appeal does not ask for a review of the order. But independently of that the judgment is right upon the merits, and should be affirmed upon the opinion rendered by the learned judge below.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Little v. Wirth

New York Superior Court — General Term
Dec 1, 1893
6 Misc. 301 (N.Y. Misc. 1893)
Case details for

Little v. Wirth

Case Details

Full title:LITTLE v . WIRTH

Court:New York Superior Court — General Term

Date published: Dec 1, 1893

Citations

6 Misc. 301 (N.Y. Misc. 1893)
26 N.Y.S. 1110

Citing Cases

Reardon v. Shimelman

Watkins v. Goodall, 138 Mass. 533, 536; Nash v. Webber, 204 Mass. 419, 425, 90 N.E. 872; Hawkes v. Broadwalk…